triangle.com | Home

Your location is ...   [change] Share your photos, news and more!  [sign in or register]
Search

Enough of the Poor Movie Reviews! (Transformers)


The "Transformers" review was the last straw. I have read the N&O since I was 13 (8 years ago) and have yet to see a single movie review that was even remotely decent. I discussed this prospect with everyone I know, and apparantly they only read movie reviews now because they know that 9 times out of 10, if the reviewer said it was bad, it was great, and if the reviewer said it was good, it was a sappy, drawn out snorefest that only some of the elderly and a few females would enjoy (pardon the gross generalization there, but you catch my drift). Case in point: Transformers. Rating: 2 stars. The movie is about 20 foot tall robots doing battle for the Earth's future... of course it is going to be over the top! Did Mr. Lindsey note the mind-numbingly incredible special effects? No. Instead he chose to make comments about the few humorous parts of the movie that, while they may not have tickled HIS funny bone, there was not a single person who wasn't laughing in the sold-out theater I was in. So in order to give the movie a proper review, I decided to take it upon myself and a couple friends of mine who (I feel) are more than qualified (One of my friends and I just graduated with degrees in Animation (a HUGE part of this movie), and another friend has her degree in Film-making). So here it goes!

 

Transformers (PG-13 sci-fi action violence)
Rating: 4.5 stars

The premise is simple. Two forces of good and bad robots (Autobots and Decepticons, respectively) battle for Earth's future. The execution, however, goes far beyond that. The initial hour or so of the movie is spent developing the plot, storyline, and the human characters, punctuated with relatively short, intense, action sequences. The story itself is not over the top at all considering the premise, the characters are engaging and extremely well played (With the exception of the S7 agent played by John Turturro, who seemed to lack any real depth and made me stop watching the movie and start trying to figure out why, exactly, his character was there. But only for the few scenes he was in), and the action sequences are beautiful, intense, amazingly executed pieces of work. The special effects were absolutely incredible in every way, and the transformers were absolutely amazing to watch in action. Whether transforming, fighting, or just milling about, the transformers were engaging characters in their own right, and you can feel the pangs of emotion for them during the massive fight scenes. Director Michael Bay certainly exceeded all of our expectations of him (which were quite low, considering the flop that Pearl Harbor and most of his other movies are) and delivered an immersive piece of art that had the entire theatre on the edge of their seats for most of the movie. The only real gripes we had with the movie was that the faces of the transformers were not at all like they were in the original cartoons/toys (but they still looked amazing nonetheless), and that in older forms, there were only a maximum of 10 things that moved when the transformers transformed from vehicle to robot, but in the movie there were hundreds or thousands (again, it still looked utterly incredible). This movie is definately going to be hard to beat as far as action movies go, and if you're in the mood for an afternoon well spent, go see this movie as soon as you can and as many times as you can (we will be going at least 10 times, as this is the kind of movie that one should experience in the theatre)

 

 

Let me know what you think!

 

PS- the exact terminology i used after the movie was "Wow... I just spent almost three hours having my eyes and ears assaulted by the sheer volume of awesome coming from that movie"

Average rating
(1 vote)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

your review of Transformers

A much better review than the one in the paper!  I agree with you about N&O reviews, very disappointing.  Hope you do more reviews -- at least it gives me some info to make a decision about whether to see the movie.  I also enjoyed Transformers!

you wanted an opinion

god.....you suck....you sound like a musician trying to review another musician's cd...you couldn't carry lindsey's popcorn...

don't quit your day-job...

wow

thats some awesome constructive criticism there pal... thanks a bunch...

look here, 35 in a 75 zone

you didn't ask for constructive criticism ........you wanted to know what eveybody thought...

You are such a homer....

uhm... k

whatever works for you pal... but your comment against my review has exactly zero credibility due to the fact that you gave no reason why you thought it was bad, you just went off on a tangent for no apparent reason.

nooo.......

ZERO credibity = posting your OWN review of a movie on some online chat board cause you and your nerdy little friends didn't like what the REAL critic had to say about your toy-made-into-a-movie, movie....

let's all hold our breaths for your review on Barry Lyndon, or Forest Gump, or Psycho, Blood Simple, or Amadeaus.
i'll make coffee....

anyone can be a critic

it doesnt take any sort of degree... just an opinion and a basic understanding of story development. So saying that Lindsey (no offence to him) is a "REAL" critic simply because he gets paid for it is an all together ludicrous statement.

My credibility comes from the fact that I have a degree in a field that was a huge part of this movie, as well as the fact that I consulted other people who have degrees in film or animation. This schooling has allowed us to notice things in movies (and other forms of entertainment) thatattract or repulse viewers. For instance: can you give me a couple reason why the transformers themselves were so well done (aside from the models and textures)? I highly doubt that you noticed the secondary motion or how the rig was built or the deformers that were in place to make them seem more realistic. I didn't write about these things in my review because most people don't know what they are, but they are part of the transformers that makes them seem more realistic and/or lifelike. Which, in turn, equates to a higher quality movie.

What I find amusing is that, despite your multiple opportunities to do so, you have yet to provide a single reason as to why you think that my review was bad. All you have done so far is flame me from behind your shield of internet anonimity. How childish. How about you save your disjointed mumblings for oh, say, the MTV forums, where people of your intellectual mindset like to lurk, and leave a forum that should be used for critique and discussion to the adults/adult minded. Thanks. 

yes, yes.....EVERYONE is a critic.....

but you are challenging a PAID critic and a damn good one.....

Just when I think, "Surely this person has reached and encapsulates the limits of Internet tedium" you go and push the boundary even further. Your post is an orgy of stultifying cacophonous verbal depravity; an exercise in literary impotence, and an offense to all of good taste and decency.
Clearly, you have lost your fingertip grip on reality and have descended into an abyss of irreversible lunacy. Generally, there is nothing wrong with having nothing worthwhile to say - unless you insist on saying it. A long period of non-posting would be most welcome on your part. I am reminded of something relevant that Benjamin Disraeli said: "He was distinguished for ignorance - for he had only one idea and that was wrong."
What possessed you to think that you were capable of being entertaining or interesting to read? Genius does what it must, talent does what it can, and you had best do what you're told, you dyslexic lobotomy patient. Maybe you wouldn't read like such a pathetic loser if you didn't eat all those paint chips and lead pencils when you were a kid;
In conclusion, thank you. We were all refreshed and challenged by your unique point of view. 
you say you have a degree in the field, but you didn't say you WORK in the field. Couldn't get a job reflecting your degree?......how is work at the drive thru going for you?

actually

i just graduated about 2 weeks ago, so no, I havent gotten a job in my field, and I haven't tried either. But thats enough of my personal life for a forum, thank you very much. So you're a Fan of the aforementioned critic, thats fine, all you had to say is "I thought Transformers sucked" and all would have been fine. But no, you immediately launched into a series of childish posts that consist of insulting me personally and name calling. On the same note, in my last post I finally fell to your level and returned a small portion of the insults given. Could you let it die there? No, because you seem to be the type of person who thinks that they are right despite anybody elses opinions solely because they are your opinions. Have you said a single word about why you disagree with my post? No. I've pointed this out time and time again and all you can do is come up with different ways to insult me (e.g. calling me a pathetic loser, a nerd, a homer, etc.). So stop. You disagree and (apparantly) have a personal grievance against me despite the fact that I have no idea who you are. We get it. So how about you go find someone else to pester? Seriously. Its a movie review. There is absolutely no logical reason for you to be so bent out of shape over it. Did you happen to look at the box office ratings? Transformers debuted at #1 the first weekend and for the past 2 weeks it has remained at #2. It is the #4 movie so far this year, is #53 on the list of ALL TIME domestic grosses and is #96 on the list of ALL TIME worldwide grosses. (source: http://www.boxofficemojo.com/) So I'm just going to go out on a limb here and say that you opinion is in the vast minority when related to this movie. Deal with it and stop making personal attacks against me just because I hold a view that is not yours.

level of conversation here disappoints

I just joined the forum today. Is this level of bad-mouthing directed at another participant (carbonlib directed at Ctranbarger) acceptable? If so, I'm outta here. What happened to r-e-s-p-e-c-t?