share.triangle.com - UNC - Comments

Thanks! I appreciate the

Art_Wannabe — Wed, 21 Jan 2009 08:24:48 -0500

Thanks! I appreciate the feedback.

interesting shot

mcaroline — Wed, 21 Jan 2009 08:10:37 -0500

I like the foreground composition and the almost sepia like colour.

better

mcaroline — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 16:49:12 -0400

Nice shot,

Backgroiund

mcaroline — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 16:48:20 -0400

Would have been a great shot if the camera guy hadn't been in the background

enhamcing this photo

mcaroline — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 16:47:09 -0400

Do some cropping-this is a great action shot! You can make it even better.

cheerleaders

mcaroline — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 16:45:17 -0400

Nice action-shame you lost the girl on the left. Love the movement in the girl on the right!

requesting info from ceremony

Visitor — Fri, 22 Aug 2008 23:06:00 -0400

Hi , I am Andrea Stinson and would like to know more info about this AAU Hall of Fame induction that was awarded to me. I am very honored to have been selected and wish I was informed about the ceremony so I could have been there. Please for future references here is my email and my home address 8023 Linda lake Dr. Charlotte NC 28215. Thank You for this most honorable induction..

Heels year

Phil Hawkins — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:28:35 -0400

I read the version of this post in the N&O, and they did not print your final observation about the win in Cameron, so I was going to put that in. But there was the comeback win against Clemson as well.

You're right, the heels will be back with a vengeance... and I predict Hansbrough will be back for his senior year. And if Lawson and Ellington return, oh my...

CAROLINA HAD A GREAT YEAR!

scoreboard1 — Mon, 07 Apr 2008 12:03:14 -0400

North Carolina will be back because it is still a top five college basketball program.
It hurts right now but the HEELS will be back chasing its fifth NCAA banner in the near future.
Catch the Heels run in the tourney and check out the Final Four items on the following link:
http://www.ioffer.com/i/46186481
http://www.ioffer.com/i/46186671
http://www.ioffer.com/i/45078486
http://www.ioffer.com/i/45501826
http://www.ioffer.com/i/43182761
http://www.ioffer.com/i/43985351
GO HEELS!

Visitor you make the scum on

Visitor — Mon, 07 Apr 2008 10:37:08 -0400

Visitor you make the scum on the bottom of my shoe look good!

UNC loss to Kansas

Visitor — Mon, 07 Apr 2008 09:43:08 -0400

I'm so happy that both basketball factories from North Carolina lost, and UNC looking so pathetic makes it even more sweet. I only hope both UNC and Duke lose their next 463 games. But the good news is that both Roy and Mike are just about done, not to mention that obnoxious moron and Duke ass-kisser, Dick 'The Idiot" Vitale. I wish the black kids would quit coming to racist-redneck land to make the white coaches look good. Kudos to Davidson, however!

Officiating for women's games

Moncla — Fri, 04 Apr 2008 19:18:06 -0400

We were so pleased to read in the Tuesday April 1, 2008 News
and Observer - "Let's hear it, fans and armchair coaches"
...our most memorable moments of the tournaments.

I was new to tournament viewing...and I regret watching
TV when Rutgers was playing George Washington Women's Games
and then there was no improvement watching LSU and UNC Women.
There were definite brutal and mean teams versus humane
victims.
I finally quit watching before the end of each game
because I could no longer endure looking at the expressions
on the faces of the injured and abused players at the hands
of the opposing team and the not so perfect referees and the
injustice of the setting for the UNC Women.
To call RUTGERS or LSU "GAMES" is an oxymoron is ever
there were such. The original definition of 'game' was "to
leap merrily".

I wonder about the value of such brutal experiences.

If one is looking for evidence of our evolving humanity,
some of the competitions leave much to be desired.

Analyze yo self Jeff. Check

charlie — Thu, 27 Mar 2008 21:08:20 -0400

Analyze yo self Jeff. Check out Lee breaking down the numbers for Washington St. if you need thoughtful analysis.

Awesome analysis! However,

Charlie — Thu, 27 Mar 2008 20:09:25 -0400

Awesome analysis! However, since UNC always speeds the game up (as much as any team in the nation) you can expect not only UNC to score more points, but the Cougars as well. The effect of the Courgar defense will be felt even if the averages are slightly higher. I'd trend the numbers upward slightly because of this. i.e. UNC stands about a 50-50 chance if they score more than 65 and almost no chance if they score less than 65.

When Carolina scores points is almost as important as the number of points they score. If Carolina builds an early lead (even if the score is low) it will be tough for the Cougar's to gain points quickly because of their style. If Washington State rushes the ball they will be playing out of their confidence zone. If they don't try to score quickly there might not be enough possessions to take the lead before the clock shows all zeros.

More, Lee! More!

Jeff — Mon, 24 Mar 2008 13:38:31 -0400

Bring us some post-Arkansas smack-talk (or at least insightful analyisis). I know you're busy being a lawyer and all, but that takes a back seat during tourney time, my friend.

Smiling from ear to ear,
Jeff