share.triangle.com - Chapel Hill - Comments

awesome

Visitor — Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:21:36 -0400

awesome

Stop Foreclosure in Raleigh Durham NC

stopforeclosure — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:51:11 -0400

We Buy houses to avoid Foreclosure in Raleigh, Durham and surrounding areas of Triangle NC.

Have you received a pre-foreclosure notice from court house? - no problem, there is enough time to do Short Sale with Bank and Lender by paying them remaining mortgage. You absolutely pay nothing. No Fees, No Sales commission, No Closing cost.

Stop Foreclosure in Apex, Cary, Morrisville, Garner, Chapel Hill, Holly Springs, Knightdale, Wake Forest, Fuquay Varina, Wendell and Zebulon NC.

NK Management LLC is local real estate investors group in the Triangle area of North Carolina. Our main focus is to find solutions for home owners who are not able to sell their properties. This may be due to various reasons such as facing Foreclosure, Tax Lien, Probate, Divorce or any other financial problem.

We have proven long experience in dealing with local Foreclosing Attorneys and Mortgage Lenders, which help us to successfully negotiate your remaining Loan. This is a practical winning deal! You can sell your house quickly and even with negative equity. We are NOT real estate agent or broker, so there are no fees or commissions to pay. We buy properties in any condition or shape.

For more details, please contact at http://www.nkmanage.com/Stop-foreclosure-end-eviction-sell-house-short-sale.html

Regarding Dr. Rebecca Pulliam Francis (ABWA)

Shinnie — Sat, 21 Jun 2008 14:50:12 -0400

We are happy that Wake Technical Community College are rewarding women for excellence in business. Anyone can search scholarships for women, minorities and college. Do a college scholarships search. Email colleges or scholarships for information. Education is the key for women. Go to scholarship for women Today learn more.

Much better

Art_Wannabe — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 22:28:41 -0400

I replaced this picture with one set to a much lower resolution, and it looks much better. Thanks for the tip!

Thanks for the great info.

Art_Wannabe — Sat, 14 Jun 2008 05:16:52 -0400

Thanks for the great info.

Sizing

Java55 — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 23:56:01 -0400

The preview size is 470 pixel wide by 500 pixels tall presently, although at one time it was larger. Edited vs. unedited might make a good topic to post in the photo forum or to just tag onto a catch-all thread I started which doesn't need any rhym or theme just to keep it going. The photo forum has been so slow for so long now, all one has to do is check for updated dates to know someone has posted in it.

Anyway, here's a link to save for that catch-all thread if its ever needed;

http://share.triangle.com/node/15251

Cover Shot

Java55 — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 23:19:44 -0400

That would make an excellent cover shot for some kind of publication the Morehead Planetarium might want to put out someday. Its got all the right elements - Love it!

Your guess is as good as

Art_Wannabe — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 21:08:05 -0400

Your guess is as good as mine. I wish I could say I had a special technique, but I guess it was just luck.

Where's your reflection?

breakPRranks — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:35:34 -0400

I don't see any trace of you reflected in the globe. Did you employ a specific technique, or is the image just "busy" enough to disguise the cameraman?

Very nice shot

tortogle — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:47:30 -0400

This is a very interesting picture. Good work!!

editing and resizing

Art_Wannabe — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:32:54 -0400

Thanks for the helpful reply. I guess I didn't know about resizing. I just saw that I can do something in paint. Any suggestions? How do you know what to size you need, trial and error?

I also had not thought about the issue of edited vs not. I'm new here. Would this be a good forum topic?

Gardenia

Java55 — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 02:16:48 -0400

Darker? I haven't noticed that as much but one thing I do notice is the preview images are quite fuzzy here when this site resizes them. If I resized mine beforehand to the exact size of the preview (or smaller) I can get a crisp picture but the details are microscopic. If I upload an unedited full-sized version (3.1 mpx on a 6.0 mpx viewing area), I can see plenty of details in the downloaded original, although somewhat fuzzy because of the 3.1 on 6 ratio my antique camera has at max (plenty good enough for 8x10 prints and bordering on 16x20's) but the previews here are really fuzzy. If I resize my picture no camera information gets sent with the image (which means it was edited in some way), but if I send the original unedited version the camera info stays with the photo so people will know the image wasn't altered in any way. So its a toss-up which way to go...

Thanks for all the

Art_Wannabe — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:37:02 -0400

Thanks for all the encouraging comments!

oak treehopper

mcaroline — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 08:23:53 -0400

It looks prehistoric-very cool-nice photo.

Oak treehopper

jpo_05_09_07 — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:08:15 -0400

Yep, that's it! BugGuide is my fav insect ID website. I read the info, very interesting. I'm surprised I haven't come across one of these Treehopper guys. Again, great job!