http://share.triangle.com/node/27261 Comments for "Clinton meeting with Lieberman- a step backwards?" en http://share.triangle.com/node/27261#comment-269114 <p>Clinton might should have stayed away...</p> Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:45:25 -0400 mwilliam comment 269114 at http://share.triangle.com http://share.triangle.com/node/27261 <!-- BeginContext name="" q="forum" --> <p><img src="/%3Cobject%20width=" alt="" height="344" /></p> <p><img src="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3QzmC9-SLvs" alt="" /><img src="/%3Cobject%20width=" alt="" height="265" /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3QzmC9-SLvs" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3QzmC9-SLvs</a> <p>Many have said Obama's talk on settlements is tougher than past presidents'. That could be another thread and subject of debate itself. </p> <p>So, does anyone have any thoughts on the message we are sending having Clinton meet with Avigdor Lieberman, Israel's FM? Should we have denied him contact with our officials until he himself complied with international law? </p><!-- EndContext --> <!-- BeginContext name="forum-teaser" q="*" --> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3QzmC9-SLvs Many have said Obama's talk on settlements is tougher than past presidents'. That could be another thread and subject of debate itself. So, does&hellip;<!-- EndContext --> <p><a href="http://share.triangle.com/node/27261">read more</a></p> http://share.triangle.com/node/27261#comment current events Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:04:34 -0400 jabdo 27261 at http://share.triangle.com