<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://share.triangle.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>share.triangle.com - Comments</title>
 <link>http://share.triangle.com</link>
 <description>Comments</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>NO WAY. Why fire a coach</title>
 <link>http://share.triangle.com/node/15714#comment-112049</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;NO WAY. Why fire a coach that took once a struggling team and turn them into Stanley Cup Champions? Yeah not making the playoffs for the past 2 is painfull but there have been countless injuries and such but Peter Laviolette is great for the canes.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 21:47:25 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Visitor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 112049 at http://share.triangle.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&quot;sense&quot; makes  more sense.</title>
 <link>http://share.triangle.com/node/15755#comment-112048</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;sense&quot; makes  more sense.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 21:41:47 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Visitor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 112048 at http://share.triangle.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Nonsincical Kartewn</title>
 <link>http://share.triangle.com/node/15755#comment-112046</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Illiturute kartwenists awr verry funni&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 18:56:24 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Doug Jesseph</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 112046 at http://share.triangle.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Wow!</title>
 <link>http://share.triangle.com/node/15755#comment-112045</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It makes perfect cents!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 18:43:01 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Fred Black</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 112045 at http://share.triangle.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>since sense</title>
 <link>http://share.triangle.com/node/15755#comment-112037</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I sense z problem with your spelling, since the cartoon doesn&#039;t make sense.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 15:34:27 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Harry Kelton</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 112037 at http://share.triangle.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Americans in general turning away from Hillary! (By the droves)</title>
 <link>http://share.triangle.com/node/15693#comment-112036</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Mrs. &lt;em&gt;Clintoon&#039;s&lt;/em&gt; &amp;quot;mouth has proved to be her ruin&amp;quot; or so the consensus seems to be, if the press has any credibility left at all. After months of the television press seeming to favor one canidate one week and another the next; the bad has finally outweighed any good Hillary might have &lt;strong&gt;ever&lt;/strong&gt; accrued.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;   Seems like most folks that have opined with me about&lt;em&gt; Mrs. Clintoon&lt;/em&gt;, have almost without exception, remarked about Hillary&#039;s perceived sense of desperation not only in her far fetched public attacks in regards to her opponent but the high irritating pitch with which she delivered some of her outright untruths about Senator O. as well as her own non accomplishments that she&#039;d have us believe spanned the globe. Especially when her globetrotting involved &amp;quot;&lt;strong&gt;sniper fire&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;quot;...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;   Many were I suppose, wondering just how much more saturation American voters could tolerate before tuning Hillary &amp;amp; her red faced hubby totally out. In retrospect, it seems as if &lt;em&gt;Willie&lt;/em&gt; was the one that&lt;em&gt; started&lt;/em&gt; out too rough and had to be reigned in by the Mrs. herself. And as we all know by now, no one but no one seems to have any control over what comes out of Hillary&#039;s mouth (or tear ducts); truth lies&lt;strong&gt; or&lt;/strong&gt; dares...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These past months seem to be a textbook example of precisely how &lt;strong&gt;not &lt;/strong&gt;to run a Presidential campaign. Everything that &lt;em&gt;could &lt;/em&gt;go wrong, seems to have done just that. Only now are we getting a clearer notion of just how deeply in debt Hillary&#039;s campaign truly is. There have been rumors in the past as well as a few articles of how &lt;strong&gt;vendors&lt;/strong&gt; serving her staff&#039;s breakfast &amp;amp; snack needs, had seemingly been stiffed or placed on hold til further notice by Hillary&#039;s strongmen (and women) higher ups.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Certainly the primary reason Hillary continues to &lt;strong&gt;&#039;make like a tick&#039;&lt;/strong&gt; even now, would be in her fleeting hope of recouping &lt;em&gt;some&lt;/em&gt; of &lt;strong&gt;her&lt;/strong&gt; personal monies that &lt;strong&gt;she&lt;/strong&gt; &#039;loaned&#039; the campaign in darker times. A heavy concern now by too many pundits seems to be that &lt;em&gt;now &lt;/em&gt;would indeed be the time Hillary should cut her losses &amp;amp; close shop. Trouble with that is, not only a stale sort of pride Hillary &amp;amp; Willie seem to share but an obvious common desire to make up some of her financial losses by burrowing in &amp;amp; hanging on for dear life.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This &lt;em&gt;final &lt;/em&gt;chapter seems to chip away at one of Hillary&#039;s many &lt;em&gt;&#039;theme songs&#039;&lt;/em&gt; about how she wanted to help the&lt;em&gt; little guy&lt;/em&gt;; the&lt;em&gt; middle American&lt;/em&gt; with too much on a plate at one time, so to speak. It appears now that&lt;em&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Hillary&#039;s plate&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; &lt;em&gt;has been &lt;/em&gt;and &lt;strong&gt;is&lt;/strong&gt; her number one concern at the end of the day or better yet at the tail end of her strange campaign.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Many are&lt;em&gt; &lt;strong&gt;so&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; thankful that we won&#039;t have to look at&lt;em&gt; &#039;the triplets&#039;&lt;/em&gt; too much longer. It has been a &lt;em&gt;very&lt;/em&gt; unpleasant chapter in U.S. politics and I pray that Hillary will never be so crass as to try and repeat this &lt;strong&gt;mess&lt;/strong&gt; in some other race, later on down &lt;strong&gt;her&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;road...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 14:46:35 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>flolake</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 112036 at http://share.triangle.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Oh my...shocking? ITS</title>
 <link>http://share.triangle.com/node/15755#comment-112033</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Oh my...shocking? ITS disgraceful. hint to editors: where&#039;s my apostrophe?!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 14:20:48 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Madeleine Roberts</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 112033 at http://share.triangle.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What North Carolina should do...</title>
 <link>http://share.triangle.com/earlyprimary#comment-112032</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I applaud Michigan and Florida for what they did, and think the remaining states (including North Carolina) should follow suit.  Then the national parties would be forced to choose: Either bar all delegates from every state except Iowa and New Hampshire, or admit that letting these two states have a disproportionate say in the presidential selection process year after year is ridiculous.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The system is already broken, but apparently it won&#039;t get fixed until a few more states do like Florida and Michigan and make that fact even more obvious than it already is.  So North Carolina should do exactly that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 14:12:42 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>rhodent</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 112032 at http://share.triangle.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Powell&#039;s cartoon</title>
 <link>http://share.triangle.com/node/15755#comment-112031</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;P. Cunningham beat me to this!  &quot;No since keeping these...&quot;?How in the world could you misspell this word?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 13:27:41 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jennifer Cashen</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 112031 at http://share.triangle.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I enjoy your cartoons, but</title>
 <link>http://share.triangle.com/node/15755#comment-112030</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I enjoy your cartoons, but but agree with the previous comment.  Spelling mistakes are really distracting.  Does someone check for this kind of error?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 12:47:49 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Visitor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 112030 at http://share.triangle.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Powelltoon on May 11</title>
 <link>http://share.triangle.com/node/15755#comment-112027</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, sadly the cartoon on the editorial page that began, &quot;No since...&quot; should have read &quot;No sense...&quot;, but we have to remember how many times over the years we have had to lower the bar in all aspects of society so we can be diverse and feel good about ourselves. I feel good! It could have read, &quot;No cents...&quot;! The News &amp;amp; Observer obviously has a well educated, diverse editorial staff with high self esteem. And after all, what&#039;s more important than that?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 12:16:01 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Steve Cook</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 112027 at http://share.triangle.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Sunday cartoon.</title>
 <link>http://share.triangle.com/node/15755#comment-112025</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Shouldn&#039;t &#039;No since keeping&#039; be &#039;No sense keeping&#039;, or is that all nonsense?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 11:18:21 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Joe Turner</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 112025 at http://share.triangle.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>May 11 cartoon</title>
 <link>http://share.triangle.com/node/15755#comment-112023</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I was appalled to open the op ed page and read your cartoon this morning.  The use of an incorrect word, in this case &quot;since&quot; when it should have been &quot;sense&quot; by the higher level editorial staff of our newspaper is totally unacceptable.  I can accept that mistakes do happen, but was there no one proof reading this work?  Who is in charge over there?  What a great example this sets for all of our school children.  I hope they stick with the comics.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 11:13:02 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Turner</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 112023 at http://share.triangle.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cartoon of 11MAY</title>
 <link>http://share.triangle.com/node/15755#comment-112022</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It should be &quot;no sense&quot;. This is really an embarrassing mistake, in my humble opinion. I almost spilled my morning coffee when I saw this error. That no one caught it is shocking.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 10:22:45 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lee Richardson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 112022 at http://share.triangle.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>May 11 ed. cartoon</title>
 <link>http://share.triangle.com/node/15755#comment-112021</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I can&#039;t believe the use of since instead of sense made it into publication. Whatever happened to editors?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 10:02:09 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Woodyard</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 112021 at http://share.triangle.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
