Submitted by Visitor (not verified) on November 28, 2007 - 11:58pm.
This is ridiculous. The state or the prosecutor or the person who accused him should have to pay the back child support, or Mr. Dail should be a able to sue the state for whatever he has to pay or the money be taken from the victims fund and given to the gold digging individual (I would use another word to explain how I feel but this is a public forum). This man has suffered enough and shouldn't be subjected to further humiliation, and legal raping. That's right the victim here is Mr. Dail and he has been RAPED by the legal system and it is getting ready to happen again. Justice is definately not blind and this sounds like double jepordy. Why don't the state TAX one dollar from all the child support payers made on one day and give it to the woman, that way no one feels it. If raising Mr. Dails son was so bad why didn't she give him up for adoption. She should sue the state not Mr. Dail. I hope Mr. Dail gets justice, but I'm not counting on it.
No, the state should pay the back child support
This is ridiculous. The state or the prosecutor or the person who accused him should have to pay the back child support, or Mr. Dail should be a able to sue the state for whatever he has to pay or the money be taken from the victims fund and given to the gold digging individual (I would use another word to explain how I feel but this is a public forum). This man has suffered enough and shouldn't be subjected to further humiliation, and legal raping. That's right the victim here is Mr. Dail and he has been RAPED by the legal system and it is getting ready to happen again. Justice is definately not blind and this sounds like double jepordy. Why don't the state TAX one dollar from all the child support payers made on one day and give it to the woman, that way no one feels it. If raising Mr. Dails son was so bad why didn't she give him up for adoption. She should sue the state not Mr. Dail. I hope Mr. Dail gets justice, but I'm not counting on it.